Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test @inline for cost functions for speed improvements #90

Closed
moustachio-belvedere opened this issue Jun 29, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

test @inline for cost functions for speed improvements #90

moustachio-belvedere opened this issue Jun 29, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
to explore

Comments

@moustachio-belvedere
Copy link
Member

Adding @inline compiler hints to the Boltzmann integration functions, which in turn are called by the cost functions sent to NLOpt.jl, may give us a little speedup for little work. Will investigate over the next week or two.
@moustachio-belvedere
Copy link
Member Author

Tested using non-singular, constant sample rate data, @inline gave no improvement. Julia compiler probably smart enough to optimise where appropriate anyway. Closing for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
to explore
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@moustachio-belvedere