-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Calculation of the T-matrix using the DDA #103
Comments
Original comment by |
Original comment by |
Original comment by |
Another related idea is compressive sensing, see e.g. |
Such calculation with ADDA (using plane-wave excitation) has been performed in |
Another application of ADDA for such problem is described in |
Another related issue is, whether such constructed T-matrix is always meaningful. For instance, Farafonov et al. showed that for some particle shapes (even much smaller than the wavelength) the T-matrix cannot be constructed (with any of the standard methods) due to failure of the analytic continuation of the fields expressed in series of vector spherical wave functions. While the DDA is not explicitly mentioned there, it may nevertheless be affected. For instance, I would not be surprised if the T-matrix obtained through the DDA would not uniformly converge with increasing its order (or the scattering quantities won't converge). Farafonov V., Il׳in V., Ustimov V., and Prokopjeva M. On the analysis of Waterman׳s approach in the electrostatic case, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 178, 176–191 (2016). |
Python script for such calculation is available from https://gitlab.com/k.czajkowski/addatmatrix/ . Currently, it uses plane-wave incident fields (with some optimal sampling) and direct calculation of spherical-harmonics expansion of the scattered fields from dipole polarizations. |
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
yurkin
on 12 Jul 2010 at 5:41The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: