Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shape generation as a composition of basic shapes #79

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 12, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Shape generation as a composition of basic shapes #79

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 12, 2015 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
comp-Logic Related to internal code logic feature Allows new functionality pri-Low Kept mostly for reference usability Makes using code more convenient wontfix We decided not to take any action on this issue
Milestone

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Implement possibility to generate shape as an arbitrary composition of
simpler shapes, with reading a description from a file - each line
describes one simple shape, like

sphere size position
ellipsoid ratios size position orientation

It is hard to implement, since will probably require rewriting all the
existent shapes as a self-contained blocks, so the parser will then run
necessary blocks in a sequence. Actually the big part make_particle.c will
require changes.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by yurkin on 7 May 2009 at 4:16

@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter added OpSys-All usability Makes using code more convenient comp-Logic Related to internal code logic pri-Low Kept mostly for reference labels Aug 12, 2015
@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by yurkin on 7 May 2009 at 4:17

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

There is language Hyperfun which is much more suitable for combination of basic 
shapes. Therefore, reimplementing it in ADDA doesn't make a lot of sense. 
Moreover, now a tool chain to work with Hyperfun models in ADDA is available at 
misc/hyperfun.

The only remaining issue is models with multiple materials, but that would 
probably be solved some time. So this issue doesn't seem relevant anymore.

Original comment by yurkin on 17 Jan 2012 at 3:08

  • Changed state: WontFix

@myurkin myurkin added feature Allows new functionality wontfix We decided not to take any action on this issue and removed auto-migrated labels Aug 13, 2015
@myurkin myurkin added this to the 1.1 milestone Aug 13, 2015
@myurkin myurkin self-assigned this Aug 13, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
comp-Logic Related to internal code logic feature Allows new functionality pri-Low Kept mostly for reference usability Makes using code more convenient wontfix We decided not to take any action on this issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants