Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Create Manifest Function for Local Persistence Volume Static Provisioner #27

Closed
lb4368 opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Create Manifest Function for Local Persistence Volume Static Provisioner #27

lb4368 opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees
@SirishaGopigiri
Labels
2-Manifests Relates to manifest/document set related issues enhancement New feature or request priority/medium Default priority for items ready for review Patchset(s) related to this issue are ready to be reviewed size l 5-7+ days [multiple functional areas; complex function or capability, or multiple PSs] type: airship-core Used to identify a function will be associated with the airship-core type.
Milestone
v2.1

Comments

@lb4368
Copy link

lb4368 commented Jul 27, 2020 •
edited
Loading

To support software stack deployment of the local static volume provisioner, create a manifest function to allow delivery of Local Persistence Volume Static Provisioner (https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/sig-storage-local-static-provisioner) from treasuremap.

Proposed change
Utilize the flux helm operator in airshipctl (airshipit/airshipctl#177) to create a manifest function to configure Local Persistence Volume Static Provisioner to a cluster. Implement proper gating to validate delivery (Depends upon #26 ).

This is currently implemented in downstream lab as a local-storage manifest function.
@lb4368 lb4368 added enhancement New feature or request triage labels Jul 27, 2020
@drewwalters96 drewwalters96 added this to the betav1 milestone Jul 29, 2020
@lb4368
Copy link
Author

lb4368 commented Aug 6, 2020

Dependent issue #26 is closed so removing blocked label.

@lb4368 lb4368 removed the blocked label Aug 6, 2020
@jezogwza jezogwza modified the milestones: betav1, v2.0 Aug 19, 2020
@lb4368 lb4368 added the 2-Manifests Relates to manifest/document set related issues label Dec 8, 2020
@jezogwza jezogwza added the priority/medium Default priority for items label Dec 16, 2020
@kumarlakshman
Copy link

assign to me

@eak13
Copy link

eak13 commented Feb 11, 2021

@kumarlakshman all yours. Thanks.

@eak13 eak13 added size l 5-7+ days [multiple functional areas; complex function or capability, or multiple PSs] type: airship-core Used to identify a function will be associated with the airship-core type. labels Mar 1, 2021
@eak13
Copy link

eak13 commented Mar 2, 2021

Please ensure that this is included in the airship-core type deployment

@eak13 eak13 added the ready for review Patchset(s) related to this issue are ready to be reviewed label Mar 18, 2021
@michaelfix
Copy link

PS in review is: https://review.opendev.org/c/airship/treasuremap/+/776175

@lb4368 lb4368 modified the milestones: v2.0, v2.1 Mar 29, 2021
@SirishaGopigiri
Copy link
Contributor

I am working on this, related PS: https://review.opendev.org/c/airship/treasuremap/+/788289

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@SirishaGopigiri SirishaGopigiri

Labels
2-Manifests Relates to manifest/document set related issues enhancement New feature or request priority/medium Default priority for items ready for review Patchset(s) related to this issue are ready to be reviewed size l 5-7+ days [multiple functional areas; complex function or capability, or multiple PSs] type: airship-core Used to identify a function will be associated with the airship-core type.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v2.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
7 participants
@lb4368 @kumarlakshman @michaelfix @eak13 @jezogwza @drewwalters96 @SirishaGopigiri