Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Forwarding UX is unexpected #5641

Closed
turt2live opened this issue Nov 18, 2017 · 3 comments · Fixed by matrix-org/matrix-react-sdk#5999
Closed

Forwarding UX is unexpected #5641

turt2live opened this issue Nov 18, 2017 · 3 comments · Fixed by matrix-org/matrix-react-sdk#5999
Labels
P2 S-Major Severely degrades major functionality or product features, with no satisfactory workaround T-Defect

Comments

@turt2live
Copy link
Member

Description

From a user:

weird
when you forward everything goes grey
then I clicked a room and it forwarded it there
that's not what I'd have expected as a behavior
I would have expected a menu

This isn't the first time I've heard of this either :(

Version information

  • Platform: web (in-browser)
  • Browser: Chrome 62
  • OS: Windows 10
  • URL: tang.ents.ca (riot 0.13.1)
@lampholder lampholder added T-Defect S-Major Severely degrades major functionality or product features, with no satisfactory workaround P2 ui/ux labels Nov 23, 2017
@lampholder
Copy link
Member

I agree, the UX is a little surprising (it's a nice feature but right now it works fairly unlike anything else in Riot)

@eMPee584
Copy link

eMPee584 commented May 7, 2019

had this today; "a little surprising" is a nice euphemism for "inadequate UX"... 🤣

@TR-SLimey
Copy link
Contributor

Any news here? The forwarding system is still useless in the post-redesign 1.7.1 version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P2 S-Major Severely degrades major functionality or product features, with no satisfactory workaround T-Defect
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants