Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Icon request #339

Closed
Stanzilla opened this issue Apr 23, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Icon request #339

Stanzilla opened this issue Apr 23, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement Feature requests or suggested improvements.

Comments

@Stanzilla
Copy link

Stanzilla commented Apr 23, 2016

World of Warcraft addons (and probably some more) have TOC files (http://wow.gamepedia.com/TOC_format) and currently Atom shows the "TeX" icon for them. They don't have any official icon but https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ToC_icon.svg would probably a good starting point.

@Alhadis
Copy link
Member

Alhadis commented Apr 24, 2016

From what I can gather, LaTeX .toc files are tables of contents as well, so a more generic-looking icon is probably a good compromise.

However, this data format intrigues me: it seems widely-used on GitHub, with most files being misclassified as TeX. This clearly warrants submitting a PR to the site's language savant, but I know next-to-nothing about World of Warcraft. Are TOC files a subset of a larger DSL for WoW? Or are they just another INI-like data file?

I'm asking because if I have enough info, I'll look into getting a PR to Linguist to fix that misclassification...

@Stanzilla
Copy link
Author

It only provides meta information to the manager of those addons and lists the files that have to be loaded in order.

@Alhadis
Copy link
Member

Alhadis commented Apr 24, 2016

I'll look into it. Thanks!

@Alhadis Alhadis added the enhancement Feature requests or suggested improvements. label Oct 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Feature requests or suggested improvements.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants