Accounting for unknown (because of missing data) but probably existing power

[shsms]

What's needed?

When there's no data for some components, we should stop assuming that everything is None, because that could be very costly in big installations.

When PV inverters are not responding, we need to assume they're probably operating at maximum power.

We need to have an estimate of what could be going on with these PV inverters when they're not sending data. This should be available from the PVPool.

Then this needs to be extended to other pools.

Proposed solution

No response

Use cases

No response

Alternatives and workarounds

No response

Additional context

No response

[llucax]

When PV inverters are not responding, we need to assume they're probably operating at maximum power.

I would say what the assumption is should be left to be decided by the user, because different applications might need to make different assumptions. For example when shaving peaks, you probably want to assume no power is generated by missing PVs and discharge batteries more preemptively to avoid peaks as much as possible.

My suggestion is to make what the assumption is for missing data configurable per pool, so the user creating the pool can say this pool should assume a component is providing maximum power or not power depending on what its safety requirements are.

[llucax]

This is also related to:

• Provide information about the quality of a resampled metric #1021

They are about different types of missing data (or data quality), I'm not sure if once this issue is resolved, #1021 is still necessary. @cwasicki ?

[cwasicki]

(fixed your link)

For the case of unreachable inverters this one might be sufficient, but I see #1021 useful to more problems with the data.