Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
119 lines (84 loc) · 4.96 KB

event-bus.md

File metadata and controls

119 lines (84 loc) · 4.96 KB
Raw

Event Bus

  • RFC: 02-016
  • Authors: Ermyas Abebe, Dileban Karunamoorthy
  • Status: Draft
  • Since: 01-Dec-2020

Summary

  • The event bus is a protocol for end-to-end event delivery between distributed ledgers.
  • The protocol enables external agents to subscribe to events of interest from remote ledgers.
  • The protocol delivers events to all authorized agents using a choice of security and delivery guarantees.
  • Events can be observed by zero or more agents.

Types of Events

See specification on events for event types.

Event Capture and Delivery

Application and System Events

  • Relay drivers subscribe to all events generated by a network. These include system and application events.
  • The events are filtered based filtering rules defined in the Weaver Dapp.
  • When matches are found, the event is forwarded to all event subscribers registered in the Weaver Dapp.
  • Defining matching rules for application events might be challenging.
    • E.g. filtering events generated by Dapps based on object ID or topic name is hard if there is no standard for publishing events.
  • Drivers must be granted appropriate permissions to listen to events from the network.
    • Fine grained control of which application events are visible to drivers might be hard to achieve.
  • Drivers must maintain additional state locally in order to provide delivery guarantees (e.g at least once, sequencing, etc).

Weaver Events

  • The driver only monitors the Weaver Dapp for new events.
  • Weaver events are events registered by applications directly with the Weaver Dapp.
  • Weaver events can be part of the world state or simply emited during commit time.
    • If events are managed by the ledger, drivers can be stateless.
    • State for ensuring delivery guarantees, sequencing etc can be tracked on the ledger.
  • The data model for Weaver events are easier to enforce, which applications must comply with.

Event Proofs

The role of events can be thought of in two complementary ways with different trade-offs.

  • Events are non-critical side-effects of execution that are useful for trigering external actions.
  • Events are a way to communicate critical information to continue a larger work flow.

The trade-offs come in the form of the cost to generate proofs.

  • An event can be delivered as is, signed by the driver/relay.
    • Least cost, has little impact on the network.
  • An event can be accompanied by a proof derived from the block that produced the proof.
    • Example: a merkle proof based on a signed block header.
    • Might not be applicable to all DLTs (e.g. a Fabric transaction's validity requires further proof).
    • Lower cost, little impact on the network*.
  • An event can be signed by mulitple organizations.
    • Signatures requested explicitly from a set of orgs.
    • Stateful (Weaver) events where signatures are acquired through standard queries.
      • Cost is no different to generating standard data proofs

Delivery Gurantees

Delivery guarantees can differ depending on whether events are critical or non-critical.

  • At most once
    • Fire and forget
    • Suitable for non-critical events
  • At least once
    • Critical events
  • Exactly once
    • Critical events
    • Can be costlier to implement

Event Subscription Protocol

Discuss protocol for registering and receiving events.

  • Permissioned networks restrict visibility of a ledger's state to its members.
  • This includes visibility on application, system and Weaver events.
  • Access to a ledger's events by an external agent must be explicitly granted (similar to rules when sharing state).
  • How do external agents learn about events to subscrible to.
  • Format of event subscription messages.
  • Authorization by network after subscribing to events.
  • Registering topics and subscribers.
    • Events belong to topics which remote ledgers can subscribe to. Allow one or more subscribers per topic.
      • E.g. Multiple subsribers: remote ledgers interested in a sanctions list.
      • E.g. Single subscriber: a one-to-one relationship exists between business objects on the origin and destination ledger.
  • Push vs pull models
    • Push model.

Policies to Prevent Flooding or Spam

  • Receiving relays might need to define policies in order to prevent potential spam after registering with a remote ledger.
  • Policies can rate limit events, restrict events up to a certain size, etc.

Anatomy of an Event

  • Message structure for subscribing to events
  • Message structure encapsulating and communicating events
  • Event representation
    • A DLT-neutral standard helps here
    • Encapsulate DLT event in network neutral standard with useful metadata