Replies: 1 comment
-
Ehi @TheChenSu! This is a long debated question even for us. You are right, the zero threshold would not have any formal/theoretical justification, so I would recommend staying away from it. In general, the authors of the paper have used two main approaches to deal with these scores: 1) keep the scores continuous without thresholding, 2) Threshold at the intersection between the two peaks (which in this case looks close to -0.5). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Excellent work netZooPy team!
I have recently conducted a comparative analysis using PANDA, with quantile normalized expression data and binary information from ChIP-seq data as inputs. In the resulting GRN, I observed a bimodal distribution. I am seeking guidance on properly determining a threshold for filtering the TF-gene edges relevant to our specific biological context. Given the distribution of scores, we suspect that a score > 0 might not be the most suitable threshold as it may lead to an excessive number of false positive edges. In this regard, could you recommend a suitable threshold for the confidence scores to filter out the most significant edges? I understand that this may vary depending on the nature of the data and the specific project objectives, but any general guidance or best practices would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions