You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
NL DS leans towards putting validation errors above the field (consistent with the gov.uk approach), while the Open Forms theme puts them below. We want to avoid users having to override the container/wrapper component layout just to achieve this, as there should be CSS-only solutions.
Possible options:
flex-direction row + the order property
CSS grid with named slots/subgrids
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This will be discussed with the NLDS team in our monthly and see if this will be added to Utrecht or what are their suggestions. For now it doesn't make sense to change something since we both have the same approach.
Discussed with NL DS - the intent is indeed that the validation error is above the field, but their own storybook gives incorrect examples. They will update those components/examples.
NL DS leans towards putting validation errors above the field (consistent with the gov.uk approach), while the Open Forms theme puts them below. We want to avoid users having to override the container/wrapper component layout just to achieve this, as there should be CSS-only solutions.
Possible options:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: