-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: dendroNetwork: a R-package to create networks of dendrochronological data #6687
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: 🟡 License found: |
This was already reviewed in rOpenSci: ropensci/software-review#627 |
Hi @RonaldVisser and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:
|
@RonaldVisser I need to ping the editorial board to check if your submission is in scope due to its relatively small size. This will take a few weeks, thanks for your patience. |
@editorialbot query scope |
Submission flagged for editorial review. |
@kthyng Thanks! I'll wait patiently :) |
@RonaldVisser I've checked in with our editorial board and while the software looks useful, and has already been reviewed with rOpenSci, it is not in scope for JOSS in terms of substantial scholarly effort. Thank you for your interest and check back with us if you expand the scope of the package. |
@editorialbot reject |
Paper rejected. |
Thanks for checking! I am sad to hear that JOSS feels that way and I do not completely understand what should be expanded. |
@RonaldVisser I am sorry for my delay in responding. We have an approximate bar for substantial scholarly effort to publish with JOSS partly because our mission is to treat research software as equivalent publishing units to those used in the academic world, which also has such a bar. Your software fell on the small side relative to the bar we have chosen, which is inherently imperfect but nonetheless necessary. Please take a look at that link for more details. Thanks. |
Thanks for the extra explanation and no worries for your delay . I do fully understand that you have to chose some threshold (although I am disappointed, but that is my problem). |
Submitting author: @RonaldVisser (Ronald Visser)
Repository: https://github.com/ropensci/dendroNetwork
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 0.5.4
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @RonaldVisser. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@RonaldVisser if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: