Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Provide more metadata about how coding actually occurred, at the factor level #61

Closed
njsmith opened this issue Apr 14, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Provide more metadata about how coding actually occurred, at the factor level #61

njsmith opened this issue Apr 14, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels
statsmodels-request well-defined-task-definitely-do-this

Comments

@njsmith
Copy link
Member

njsmith commented Apr 14, 2015

In DesignInfo, we should provide:

  • For each factor, whether it is continuous or categorical
  • If categorical, what levels it has
  • If categorical, the ContrastMatrix we use for each (factor, term) pair.

This is pretty simple and obvious stuff, and useful to statsmodels (in particular, knowing what levels exist so you can generate all pairwise tests etc.).
@njsmith njsmith mentioned this issue Apr 14, 2015
Open
@njsmith
Copy link
Member Author

njsmith commented Apr 14, 2015

CC @josef-pkt

@njsmith njsmith mentioned this issue Jun 14, 2015
Open
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
statsmodels-request well-defined-task-definitely-do-this
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@njsmith