Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rectify & describe map server tickets #1280

Closed
SteveMacenski opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Rectify & describe map server tickets #1280

SteveMacenski opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@SteveMacenski
Copy link
Member

SteveMacenski commented Oct 23, 2019

I've looked at themes of tickets we have in the stack and we have a number (10+) of tickets around map server:

  • representing multi level maps
  • change maps service
  • data storage for multi level maps
  • submap sources
  • etc

Many of these cover largely the same ideas but in different ways, or in partial. I'd like to see someone that has a vision for this collapse these tickets into 1-3 tickets that covers a path forward, even if not today prepared to start on it. We have alot of pieces but no roadmap.

I'm excluding the keep out / safety zone / map labeling items since I think we have that ticket now

@SteveMacenski SteveMacenski added the nav2_wg Request discussion in the nav2 working group label Oct 23, 2019
@SteveMacenski
Copy link
Member Author

SteveMacenski commented Oct 24, 2019

Ticket list:
#392 #547 #548 #549 #1226

The way I'd classify this set is: multi-story or multi-map source map server. I'm thinking that this would be similar to the layed nature of the costmaps where we have multiple sources that can come in with some given position/orientation from a global frame, stacked, and served. This would also enable multistory buildings but someone would have to request a specific layer and not the "master" output that would be pretty garbled up. In terms of data structures, I'd think we'd want separate files so that each map is still usable independently of the whole, and for the case of occupancy grids being able to just open a png and see them.

There are others #1010 #239 that are map servery but standalone tasks

@crdelsey crdelsey removed the nav2_wg Request discussion in the nav2 working group label Dec 13, 2019
@SteveMacenski
Copy link
Member Author

Doesn't seem like there's much interest in this front. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants