Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missed optimization: computing smaller index than length does not elliminate bound check #80963

Closed
newpavlov opened this issue Jan 13, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. I-slow Issue: Problems and improvements with respect to performance of generated code.

Comments

@newpavlov
Copy link
Contributor

newpavlov commented Jan 13, 2021

Code:

pub fn foo(buf: &[u8]) -> Option<&[u8]> {
    // guard against potential overflow
    if buf.len() > usize::MAX/3 {
        return None;
    }
    let n = (3*buf.len())/4;
    Some(&buf[..n])
}

godbolt

Even replacing usize::MAX/3 with any non-zero small number (even 1) does not result in removal of the bound check.

This behavior can be reproduced on current Nightly and previous stable compiler versions.

@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink added A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. I-slow Issue: Problems and improvements with respect to performance of generated code. labels Jan 13, 2021
@the8472
Copy link
Member

the8472 commented Jan 13, 2021

Workaround:

pub fn foo(buf: &[u8]) -> Option<&[u8]> {
    if buf.len() > usize::MAX/3 {
        return None;
    }
    let n = (3*buf.len())/4;
    let n = std::cmp::min(n, buf.len());
    Some(&buf[..n])
}

@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Jan 13, 2021

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48744

@nikic nikic self-assigned this Jan 18, 2021
@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Jan 18, 2021

Upstream fix: llvm/llvm-project@a13c0f6

@MSxDOS
Copy link

MSxDOS commented Mar 5, 2021

Fixed on the latest nightly by #81451

@newpavlov
Copy link
Contributor Author

I confirm the fix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. I-slow Issue: Problems and improvements with respect to performance of generated code.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants