We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I seem to be getting a failure on the paid liquidity fees API when I try to set the include derived party flag to true.
Here I am querying for the party which has provided an AMM on the ETH market on FG and this falls over.
https://api.n00.testnet.vega.rocks/api/v2/liquidity/paidfees?partyIds=9c867b28b5a54e46639135669419d9bc521b36ed26632b75374c37137535b899&includeDerivedParties=true&epochFrom=235&epochTo=245
And here I have manually found the derived party and queried for it directly without setting that flag and it is fine.
https://api.n00.testnet.vega.rocks/api/v2/liquidity/paidfees?partyIds=b3fbd9b8a9c6cd19177e[…]dc64606ed0692b5c59a10e4990340&epochFrom=235&epochTo=245
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
wwestgarth
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
I seem to be getting a failure on the paid liquidity fees API when I try to set the include derived party flag to true.
Here I am querying for the party which has provided an AMM on the ETH market on FG and this falls over.
https://api.n00.testnet.vega.rocks/api/v2/liquidity/paidfees?partyIds=9c867b28b5a54e46639135669419d9bc521b36ed26632b75374c37137535b899&includeDerivedParties=true&epochFrom=235&epochTo=245
And here I have manually found the derived party and queried for it directly without setting that flag and it is fine.
https://api.n00.testnet.vega.rocks/api/v2/liquidity/paidfees?partyIds=b3fbd9b8a9c6cd19177e[…]dc64606ed0692b5c59a10e4990340&epochFrom=235&epochTo=245
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: