Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracer advection stencil porting ml -> tracer advection stencils #98

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Oct 12, 2022

Conversation

halungge
Copy link
Contributor

  • hflx_limiter_mo_stencil_02
  • hflx_limiter_mo_stencil_03
  • hflx_limiter_mo_stencil_04
  • step_advection_01
  • step_advection_02
  • upwind_hflux_miura_stencil_02
  • upwind_vflux_ppm_stencil_01

@halungge halungge marked this pull request as ready for review September 30, 2022 06:27
Copy link
Contributor

@abishekg7 abishekg7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@halungge halungge changed the title Tracer advection stencils Tracer advection stencil porting ml -> tracer advection stencils Oct 4, 2022
@halungge halungge merged commit c45339d into tracer_advection_stencils Oct 12, 2022
@halungge halungge deleted the tracer_advection_porting_ml branch November 11, 2022 08:56
ninaburg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2022
* adding hflx_limiter_mo_stencil_02

* changes order of args and return a tuple

* Revert "changes order of args and return a tuple"

This reverts commit 99638df.

* porting step_advection_stencil_01

* porting step_advection_stencil_02

* porting upwind_hflux_miura_stencil_02

* hflx_limiter_mo_stencil_04

* fix step_advection_stencil_01

* hflx_limiter_mo_stencil_03

* clean up: move upwind_hflux_miura_stencil_02.py

* add test for conditional branch in hflx_limiter_mo_stencil_04

* switch to using min_over in hflx_limiter_mo_stencil_03

* refactor hflx_limiter_mo_stencil_04, fix tests for Koffset

* add upwind_vflux_ppm_stencil_01

* upwind_hflux_miura_stencil_02 - fix sparse field issue, split into separate sums instead of using neighbor_sum

* remove commented out code

* fix: upwind_vflux_ppm_stencil_01

* fix: hflx_limiter_mo_stencil_01: return tuple, use int32

* hflx_limiter_pd_stencil_02.py: use int fields
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants