Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Nix Flake #2

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2024
Merged

Create Nix Flake #2

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

donn
Copy link
Contributor

@donn donn commented Jun 28, 2024

I mean, you knew this was coming

Adds a Nix flake with a derivation generated using cargo2nix. This also begins checking Cargo.lock into version control (which is required for reproducibility.)

I'm still testing this so I'll keep this as a draft for now.

Adds a Nix flake with a derivation generated using `cargo2nix`. This also begins checking `Cargo.lock` into version control (which is required for reproducibility.)
@donn donn marked this pull request as ready for review July 13, 2024 20:14
@donn
Copy link
Contributor Author

donn commented Jul 13, 2024

Tested with Fault, seems to be working A-OK but the coverage is lower than I expected (probably a difference in how we calculate coverage). But that's beside the point for this particular PR.

@Coloquinte Coloquinte merged commit 1b690eb into Coloquinte:main Jul 16, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@Coloquinte
Copy link
Owner

Is the coverage lower than Atalanta on some tests, or is it just <100% coverage? I'd expect coverage to be optimal, but ISCAS benchmarks just have a lot of gates that are not observable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants