Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multithreaded fuzzer #166

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 4, 2023
Merged

Multithreaded fuzzer #166

merged 4 commits into from
May 4, 2023

Conversation

Anilm3
Copy link
Collaborator

@Anilm3 Anilm3 commented May 4, 2023

Add multiple threads to every fuzzer process. The original objective was to use the thread sanitizer as well but it currently produces a large number of false positives with libstdc++.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #166 (d19dea0) into master (38845f5) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #166   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.43%   64.43%           
=======================================
  Files          65       65           
  Lines        3253     3253           
  Branches     1504     1504           
=======================================
  Hits         2096     2096           
  Misses        309      309           
  Partials      848      848           
Flag Coverage Δ
waf_test 64.43% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@Anilm3 Anilm3 requested a review from estringana May 4, 2023 12:42
@Anilm3 Anilm3 merged commit 2447105 into master May 4, 2023
@Anilm3 Anilm3 deleted the anilm3/multithreaded-fuzzer branch May 4, 2023 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants