This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 20, 2018. It is now read-only.
a typo fix on the surplus quotation mark #1677
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
|
While you are targeting master, it appears that your branch is based off of develop. So, I adjusted the target branch to point to develop. I'll merge into develop and then cherry-pick your commit into master. Thanks for catching and fixing these documentation errors. Much appreciated. |
rnicholus
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2016
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Brief description of the changes [REQUIRED]
a typo fix on the surplus quotation mark
What browsers and operating systems have you tested these changes on? [REQUIRED]
chrome on windows10
Are all automated tests passing? [REQUIRED]
no, manual tested.
Is this pull request against develop or some other non-master branch? [REQUIRED]
no