Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UCT/ROCM/IPC: use remote_agent if available #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2022

Conversation

edgargabriel
Copy link
Collaborator

What

use the correct remote_agent handle if information is available. Using the local_agent for both src and destination is just the backup plan in case the remote_agent info is not available, e.g. in case the user limited the visibility of devices for a/some/all processes.

Why ?

using the local_agent for both src and destination triggers a different code both in the runtime layer than using two different agents, limiting the availability of the CUs for compute operations.

How ?

use the correct remote_agent handle if information is available. Using the local_agent for both src and destination is just the backup plan in case the remote_agent info is not available, e.g. in case the user limited the visibility of devices for a/some/all processes.
@edgargabriel edgargabriel merged commit 928e15a into ROCm:develop May 9, 2022
edgargabriel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2023
…part3

AZP/RELEASE: Add ARM release - Part #3
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants