Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Pipe stderr from cargo tree processes #1879

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2023
Merged

Pipe stderr from cargo tree processes #1879

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2023

Conversation

illicitonion
Copy link
Collaborator

Now that we're racing a bunch of them in parallel, they occasionally print:

Blocking waiting for file lock on package cache
to stderr.

We print stderr if the process failed, but now swallow this benign output if the process succeeded.

@illicitonion
Pipe stderr from cargo tree processes
43627ce 
Now that we're racing a bunch of them in parallel, they occasionally
print:
> Blocking waiting for file lock on package cache
to stderr.

We print stderr if the process failed, but now swallow this benign
output if the process succeeded.
@illicitonion illicitonion merged commit c038e94 into bazelbuild:main Mar 13, 2023
@illicitonion illicitonion deleted the pipe-tree-stderr branch March 13, 2023 15:13
nyurik pushed a commit to nyurik/rules_rust that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2023
@illicitonion @nyurik
Pipe stderr from cargo tree processes (bazelbuild#1879)
20a5e32 
Now that we're racing a bunch of them in parallel, they occasionally
print:
> Blocking waiting for file lock on package cache
to stderr.

We print stderr if the process failed, but now swallow this benign
output if the process succeeded.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@UebelAndre UebelAndre UebelAndre approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@illicitonion @UebelAndre