Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

misc monitoring fixes #2

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 9, 2017

Conversation

ggouaillardet
Copy link

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles@rist.or.jp>
and have monitoring_common.h and monitoring_common_coll.h included in the distro

Signed-off-by: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles@rist.or.jp>
Signed-off-by: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles@rist.or.jp>
Signed-off-by: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles@rist.or.jp>
@bosilca bosilca merged commit 931dbe4 into bosilca:topic/monitoring Mar 9, 2017
bosilca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
This commit addresses two issues in osc/rdma:

 1) It is erroneous to attach regions that overlap. This was being
    allowed but the standard does not allow overlapping attachments.

 2) Overlapping registration regions (4k alignment of attachments)
    appear to be allowed. Add attachment bases to the bookeeping
    structure so we can keep better track of what can be detached.

It is possible that the standard did not intend to allow #2. If that
is the case then #2 should fail in the same way as #1. There should
be no technical reason to disallow #2 at this time.

References open-mpi#7384

Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@google.com>
bosilca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2020
This commit addresses two issues in osc/rdma:

 1) It is erroneous to attach regions that overlap. This was being
    allowed but the standard does not allow overlapping attachments.

 2) Overlapping registration regions (4k alignment of attachments)
    appear to be allowed. Add attachment bases to the bookeeping
    structure so we can keep better track of what can be detached.

It is possible that the standard did not intend to allow #2. If that
is the case then #2 should fail in the same way as #1. There should
be no technical reason to disallow #2 at this time.

References open-mpi#7384

Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6649aef)
Signed-off-by: Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn@google.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants