Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:support brotli/br #39

Closed
byene0923 opened this issue Jun 4, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

feat:support brotli/br #39

byene0923 opened this issue Jun 4, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request WaitingForInfo Issue is not actionable because of missing required information, which needs to be provided.

Comments

@byene0923
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

hertz only support gzip in fs.go. may support brotli/br?

Describe the solution you'd like

I think hertz can support it like valyala/fasthttp#880

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

@welkeyever welkeyever added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 6, 2022
@Duslia
Copy link
Member

Duslia commented Jun 7, 2022

I 'd like to know why you want Hertz to support brotli/br? Or could you pls tell me why gzip cannot satisfy your requirements so that we support it with a high priority.

@Duslia Duslia added the WaitingForInfo Issue is not actionable because of missing required information, which needs to be provided. label Jun 7, 2022
FGYFFFF pushed a commit to FGYFFFF/hertz that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2022
add gorm demo

feat: add gorm and jwt demo

Co-authored-by: kinggo <lilong.21@bytedance.com>
@li-jin-gou
Copy link
Member

it haven't responded or made progress for a long time, so I choose to close it. When there is a real demand, I will restart it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request WaitingForInfo Issue is not actionable because of missing required information, which needs to be provided.
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants