Add a cosmics PCL workflow to runTheMatrix

[mmusich]

PR description:

Title says it all, in preparation to add a FPix LA PCL workflow (to be run in cosmics data-taking)

PR validation:

Run successfully runTheMatrix.py -l 1005.0 -t 4 -j 8

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

N/A

[mmusich]

test parameters:

• enable_test = threading
• workflows_threading = 1005.0

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40661/33994

• This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py modified in PR(s): Add function to refine FastSim DeepJet discriminators #40553, Use --beamspot Nominal2022PbPbCollision for all Run 3 heavy-ion workflows #40653

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/AlCa (alca)
• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @saumyaphor4252, @kskovpen, @sunilUIET, @tvami, @ChrisMisan, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @tocheng, @mmusich, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-458a72/30328/summary.html
COMMIT: 677b573
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-31-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: THREADING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/40661/30328/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 9 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 3 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3555495
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3555470
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 211 log files, 162 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[tvami]

+alca

• new wf 1005 ran fine

[sunilUIET]

+pdmv

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-458a72/30337/summary.html
COMMIT: e32e15b
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-01-31-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: THREADING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/40661/30337/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 3 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3555495
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3555470
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 211 log files, 162 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[tvami]

+alca

• new wf passed (still)

[mmusich]

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 @cms-sw/upgrade-l2 can you please review and sign, so that this can be used in #40664 (after rebasing)?

[kskovpen]

+pdmv

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

The new workflow 1005 runs. Let me just point out the following warning message that can be found in the log file of step2 for that workflow, as it may be of interest to its potential users:

%MSG-e Alignment:  TkAlCaRecoMonitor:ALCARECOTkAlCosmicsInCollisions0TTkAlDQM  01-Feb-2023 18:37:14 CET Run: 360336 Event: 422152
invalid trackcollection encountered!

[perrotta]

+1

[mmusich]

The new workflow 1005 runs. Let me just point out the following warning message that can be found in the log file of step2 for that workflow, as it may be of interest to its potential users:

%MSG-e Alignment:  TkAlCaRecoMonitor:ALCARECOTkAlCosmicsInCollisions0TTkAlDQM  01-Feb-2023 18:37:14 CET Run: >360336 Event: 422152
invalid trackcollection encountered!

thanks, there was a bug indeed, fixed at #40686