-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introducing SimOnGen
and GenOnly
wfs for 2024 and 2026D110
#45005
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45005/40287
|
A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for master. It involves the following packages:
@srimanob, @cmsbuild, @sunilUIET, @miquork, @AdrianoDee, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals
RelVals
|
Note: I've added a note in the description about the needed update to the |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45005/40291
|
Pull request #45005 was updated. @cmsbuild, @subirsarkar, @sunilUIET, @miquork, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45005/40497
|
Pull request #45005 was updated. @sunilUIET, @srimanob, @subirsarkar, @AdrianoDee, @miquork can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dbc0ba/39748/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+pdmv |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
@AdrianoDee , workflow 105.0 is failing in IB [a]. May be change in this PR has broken it? Can you lease check
|
I have proposed a fix #45214 |
@@ -3133,6 +3152,21 @@ def condition(self, fragment, stepList, key, hasHarvest): | |||
'Era' : 'Phase2C17I13M9', | |||
'ScenToRun' : ['GenSimHLBeamSpot','DigiTrigger','RecoGlobal', 'HARVESTGlobal', 'ALCAPhase2'], | |||
}, | |||
'2026D110GenOnly' : { | |||
'Geom' : 'Extended2026D110', | |||
'Beamspot' : 'HLLHC', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @AdrianoDee
Just wonder that we will have the right output with this setting of beamspot?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Phat, I see this message only now. Isn't it just dummy it here? I mean: the BS is defined at SIM step no? Or we have something already at GEN step?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @AdrianoDee
Thanks for coming back, I completely forgot about my comment.
process.VtxSmeared
is part of process.pgen
. So you will get wrong parameters for vertex smearing. Using DBrealisticHLLHC
should give you the proper parameter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
process.pgen = cms.Sequence(cms.SequencePlaceholder("randomEngineStateProducer")+process.VertexSmearing+process.GenSmeared+process.GeneInfo+process.genJetMET, process.PPSTransportTask)
and
process.VertexSmearing = cms.Sequence(cms.SequencePlaceholder("VtxSmeared"))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Issue comes from typo. It should be BeamSpot
, not Beamspot
. With typo, it will pick default BS of 'Gen'
which is 2017.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix in #45685
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great thanks!
This PR proposes the addition of:
Sim
only step running only the SIM step (to be run on top of GEN);SimOnGen
wfs running the SIM step separated fromGEN
for 2024 and 2026D110 conditions;GenOnly
wfs running only the GEN step for 2024 and 2026D110 conditions.As a bonus the
ALCA
input for "upgrade" workflows is updated in order to be more general and to take the output of theRECO
step rather than being hardcoded to bestep3.root
.These are useful for us (PdmV) e.g.:
PR Validation
Running, e.g.,
15824.0
and15634.0
.