Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade jszip from 3.5.0 to 3.6.0 #2906

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2021

Conversation

nmanovic
Copy link
Contributor

@nmanovic nmanovic commented Mar 4, 2021

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade jszip from 3.5.0 to 3.6.0.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 22 days ago, on 2021-02-10.
Release notes
Package name: jszip
  • 3.6.0 - 2021-02-10
  • 3.6.0-0 - 2021-02-09
  • 3.5.0 - 2020-06-14

    3.5.0

from jszip GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: jszip

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@nmanovic nmanovic requested a review from azhavoro as a code owner March 4, 2021 03:29
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.004%) to 72.123% when pulling a994f4e on snyk-upgrade-d03313658b665b4e6163dce82ca5c5bb into 277a3ba on develop.

@bsekachev bsekachev merged commit dcfdddf into develop Mar 4, 2021
@bsekachev bsekachev deleted the snyk-upgrade-d03313658b665b4e6163dce82ca5c5bb branch March 4, 2021 07:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants