Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix "ValueError: could not convert string to float: 'ATOMIC_POSITIONS'" #721

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: devel
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Youhaojen
Copy link

@Youhaojen Youhaojen commented Sep 13, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced functionality for extracting data blocks and cell parameters.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling for unexpected input in cell parameter extraction.
  • Refactor
    • Streamlined logic for data extraction functions to improve clarity and efficiency.

Signed-off-by: Hao-Jen You <65796567+Youhaojen@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant modifications to the get_block and get_cell functions in the dpdata/qe/scf.py file. The get_block function has been refactored to consolidate its logic for extracting lines, while the get_cell function has streamlined its handling of the ibrav parameter and improved error handling. These changes enhance the clarity and efficiency of the code, focusing on robustness and maintainability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
dpdata/qe/scf.py Refactored get_block to consolidate two versions into one, improving line extraction logic. Updated get_cell to raise RuntimeError for invalid ibrav values and enhanced handling of CELL_PARAMETERS.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant get_block
    participant get_cell

    User->>get_block: Call with lines and start_marker
    get_block->>get_block: Extract lines until blank or "&"
    get_block-->>User: Return extracted block

    User->>get_cell: Call with lines
    get_cell->>get_cell: Check ibrav value
    alt ibrav found
        get_cell->>get_cell: Process CELL_PARAMETERS
    else ibrav not found
        get_cell-->>User: Raise RuntimeError
    end
Loading

Tip

OpenAI O1 model for chat
  • We have deployed OpenAI's latest O1 model for chat.
  • OpenAI claims that this model has superior reasoning capabilities than their GPT-4o model.
  • Please share any feedback with us in the discussions post.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Sep 13, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #721 will not alter performance

Comparing Youhaojen:patch-1 (1c85312) with master (c685e62)

Summary

✅ 2 untouched benchmarks

@njzjz njzjz changed the base branch from master to devel September 13, 2024 17:48
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c685e62 and 1c85312.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • dpdata/qe/scf.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
dpdata/qe/scf.py

32-32: Redefinition of unused get_block from line 15

(F811)


50-50: Loop control variable idx not used within loop body

Rename unused idx to _idx

(B007)

Additional comments not posted (2)
dpdata/qe/scf.py (2)

15-29: Refactoring looks good!

The refactoring of get_block function improves the clarity and efficiency by:

  • Consolidating two versions into one.
  • Accepting a start_marker parameter.
  • Handling the extraction of lines until a blank line or a line starting with "&" is encountered.

Great job!


Line range hint 50-81: Changes improve robustness and maintainability.

The changes to the get_cell function improve the robustness and maintainability of the code by:

  • Streamlining the logic for handling the ibrav parameter.
  • Raising a RuntimeError if the ibrav value is not found, ensuring that the function fails fast when encountering unexpected input.
  • Updating the handling of the CELL_PARAMETERS block to ensure that it checks for the correct units (Angstrom) more robustly.
  • Making the extraction of numerical values from the lines clearer with the use of list comprehensions.

These changes clarify the control flow and error handling, enhancing the overall quality of the code.

Tools
Ruff

32-32: Redefinition of unused get_block from line 15

(F811)


50-50: Loop control variable idx not used within loop body

Rename unused idx to _idx

(B007)


72-72: Yoda condition detected

Rewrite as line[0] == "a"

(SIM300)


74-74: Yoda condition detected

Rewrite as line[0] == "celldm(1)"

(SIM300)

ret = []
for idx, ii in enumerate(lines):
if "ibrav" in ii:
for idx, line in enumerate(lines):
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rename the unused loop control variable idx to _idx.

The loop control variable idx is not used within the loop body.

Rename idx to _idx to indicate that it is intentionally unused:

-    for idx, line in enumerate(lines):
+    for _idx, line in enumerate(lines):
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
for idx, line in enumerate(lines):
for _idx, line in enumerate(lines):
Tools
Ruff

50-50: Loop control variable idx not used within loop body

Rename unused idx to _idx

(B007)

return block


def get_block(lines, start_marker, skip=0):
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove the unused get_block function.

There is a redefinition of the get_block function at line 32, which is unused in the code.

Remove the unused function definition:

-def get_block(lines, start_marker, skip=0):
-    start_idx = None
-    for idx, line in enumerate(lines):
-        if start_marker in line:
-            start_idx = idx + 1 + skip
-            break
-    if start_idx is None:
-        raise RuntimeError(f"{start_marker} not found in the input lines.")
-
-    block = []
-    for line in lines[start_idx:]:
-        if line.strip() == "" or line.strip().startswith("&"):
-            break
-        block.append(line.strip())
-    return block

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Tools
Ruff

32-32: Redefinition of unused get_block from line 15

(F811)

return block


def get_block(lines, start_marker, skip=0):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

plz avoid redefining functions.

Comment on lines +70 to +71
for line in lines:
line = line.replace("=", " ").replace(",", "").split()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any reason for changing the variable names?

@wanghan-iapcm
Copy link
Contributor

please see #724

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants