Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GetReplicationCapabilities #154

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 30, 2023
Merged

Add GetReplicationCapabilities #154

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 30, 2023

Conversation

falfaroc
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Pairing the implementation branch with the associated unit-test branch.

Implementation of replication feature within PowerFlex. This brings in the retrievals of the replication capabilities which informs the module what PowerFlex is configured for.

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #
dell/csm#618

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Backward compatibility is not broken

How Has This Been Tested?

Numerous testing has been done to ensure that replication works and is similar and consistent with other drivers.

  • Manual testing between two 3.6 PowerFlex arrays.
  • Single cluster replication on PowerFlex.
  • Multi cluster replication on PowerFlex.
  • Cloud -> On-Prem replication on PowerFlex (single/multi cluster).
  • cert-csi replication testing.

@falfaroc falfaroc merged commit 2f4c263 into main Jan 30, 2023
@falfaroc falfaroc deleted the repl-get-capabilities branch March 17, 2023 13:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants