Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow to measure create/restore snapshot speed #1013

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2020

Conversation

danielmitterdorfer
Copy link
Member

With this commit we add the ability to measure throughput (in byte/s)
of the create snapshot and restore snapshot operations (the latter is
piggybacked on shard recovery in Elasticsearch). To have Rally report
the actual throughput of the server-side operation, the respective
runners don't take the response time of Elasticsearch into account but
rather how long the operation actually took. We also provide additional
meta-data how many bytes have been snapshotted / recovered. All this
let's us calculate the throughput in byte/s which is more meaningful
than the actual response time of the request.

With this commit we add the ability to measure throughput (in byte/s)
of the create snapshot and restore snapshot operations (the latter is
piggybacked on shard recovery in Elasticsearch). To have Rally report
the actual throughput of the server-side operation, the respective
runners don't take the response time of Elasticsearch into account but
rather how long the operation actually took. We also provide additional
meta-data how many bytes have been snapshotted / recovered. All this
let's us calculate the throughput in byte/s which is more meaningful
than the actual response time of the request.
@danielmitterdorfer danielmitterdorfer added enhancement Improves the status quo :Load Driver Changes that affect the core of the load driver such as scheduling, the measurement approach etc. labels Jun 11, 2020
@danielmitterdorfer danielmitterdorfer added this to the 2.0.1 milestone Jun 11, 2020
@danielmitterdorfer danielmitterdorfer self-assigned this Jun 11, 2020
@danielmitterdorfer danielmitterdorfer marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2020 05:52
Copy link
Contributor

@dliappis dliappis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM this will be super useful

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improves the status quo :Load Driver Changes that affect the core of the load driver such as scheduling, the measurement approach etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants