You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [mcx-users] Concerning cfg.unitinmm feature
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:39:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Petetin Max <petetin.max at gmail.com>
Reply-To: mcx-users at googlegroups.com
To: mcx-users
Dear Professor Fang,
I have a question concerning the feature unitinmm and more especially about its association with the function mcxdettime in Mcxlab.
Shouldn't be detp.ppath multiplied by unitinmm in this function (picture 6&7) ?
In fact, when I try it in a source / detector example in transmission geometry, I have the same results as when I do not use unitinmm concerning the time resolution.
In this example attached, I used unitinmm to transform a 404040 (in mm) grid into a 888 by using a unitinmm factor of 0.2. It is possible to see this difference in the spatial representation (picture 2 &3) but impossible to see it in the time resolution after using mcxdettime (picture 4& blue plot in picture 5).
Therefore, when I implement the unitinmm in a copy of mcxdettime I obtain the coherent result (red plot in picture 5) that I should obtain regarding the theorical result (picture 1).
Thank you in advance for your answer.
Best,
Max
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
this bug was reported by Petein Max in the below mailing list thread
https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/mcx-users/WPAOLq53qeY/h2vdyOxoBAAJ
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: