Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature/databricks-compatibility #44

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 19, 2022

Conversation

fivetran-joemarkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor

Are you a current Fivetran customer?

Fivetran created PR

What change(s) does this PR introduce?

Databricks compatibility 🧱

Did you update the CHANGELOG?

  • Yes

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes (please provide breaking change details below.)
  • No (please provide an explanation as to how the change is non-breaking below.)

Same as the source, since there was a breaking change only a while ago it would not make sense to do a breaking change here as well.

Did you update the dbt_project.yml files with the version upgrade (please leverage standard semantic versioning)? (In both your main project and integration_tests)

  • Yes

Is this PR in response to a previously created Bug or Feature Request

How did you test the PR changes?

  • CircleCi
  • Local (please provide additional testing details below)

Select which warehouse(s) were used to test the PR

  • BigQuery
  • Redshift
  • Snowflake
  • Postgres
  • Databricks
  • Other (provide details below)

Provide an emoji that best describes your current mood

🧱

Feedback

We are so excited you decided to contribute to the Fivetran community dbt package! We continue to work to improve the packages and would greatly appreciate your feedback on our existing dbt packages or what you'd like to see next.

@fivetran-joemarkiewicz fivetran-joemarkiewicz added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 13, 2022
@fivetran-joemarkiewicz fivetran-joemarkiewicz marked this pull request as ready for review September 15, 2022 14:17
packages.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@fivetran-sheringuyen fivetran-sheringuyen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @fivetran-joemarkiewicz, everything looks good to me. I just had the same question I had in the source - and a reminder to update packages.yml before release as you've already commented for yourself :)

Do you intend to keep those stripe_* schema names for integration_tests/ci/sample.profiles.yml?

@fivetran-joemarkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @fivetran-joemarkiewicz, everything looks good to me. I just had the same question I had in the source - and a reminder to update packages.yml before release as you've already commented for yourself :)

Do you intend to keep those stripe_* schema names for integration_tests/ci/sample.profiles.yml?

Thanks @fivetran-sheringuyen great call out, just updating those now!

packages.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fivetran-joemarkiewicz fivetran-joemarkiewicz merged commit 338ef8c into main Sep 19, 2022
@fivetran-joemarkiewicz fivetran-joemarkiewicz deleted the feature/databricks-compatibility branch September 19, 2022 16:21
@fivetran-joemarkiewicz fivetran-joemarkiewicz mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2022
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants