1069 automatic diff failure partly meta issue #1074
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1074 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 84.13% 84.45% +0.32%
==========================================
Files 26 26
Lines 1393 1396 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 1172 1179 +7
+ Misses 221 217 -4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
I can confirm that this PR fixes the problem I reported in #1073. I now get the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removed Line Numbers in Text Output & Changes Validation Bug Fix
Following the guidance provided by @ATheorell and the discussions in issue #1069, I have made the necessary updates to the text output. This includes the removal of line numbers from the print output, which aligns with the consensus for a cleaner and more user-friendly display. Additionally, I have corrected the changes validation function in
improvefunction.