Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FAB-18244 single node catches up with snapshot (#1964) #2021

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2020

Commits on Oct 19, 2020

  1. FAB-18244 single node catches up with snapshot (hyperledger#1964)

    Support.WriteBlock commits block to ledger asynchronously and can have
    up to one block in-flight. And there's possibility a node crashes before
    such block is persisted successfully. Normally when node restarts, Raft
    loads entries from WAL and attempts to re-apply them. However, when a
    snapshot is taken at this block, only entries after (if any) the
    snapshot are loaded, and we end up hanging here forever waiting for
    missing blocks to be pulled from nowhere in single node situation.
    
    A straightforward solution would be to peek into ledger tip first, and
    decide whether to load some "old" entries from WAL, instead of blindly
    load data after latest snapshot. Although it's trickier than it sounds:
    
    - today, we don't strictly respect the contract between Raft and state
    machine, where applied data should not be lossy and it's safe to prune
    data in WAL after snapshots. For example, in extreme case, if we lose
    the entire ledger, we should not expect it to be recoverable from WAL
    
    - etcd/raft persistence library does not provide friendly interfaces
    to control what data to load in fine-grained manner. For example,
    snap.Load() simply looks for latest snapshot available, and loads
    entries after that. If we'd like to, for example, load older data prior
    to that snapshot, we'll need to come up with our own utilities
    
    This commit aims to provide a quick fix for bug described in FAB-18244,
    leveraging the fact that we can have only one async block in-flight, and
    leave the "correct" solution to future work.
    
    Signed-off-by: Jay Guo <guojiannan1101@gmail.com>
    guoger committed Oct 19, 2020
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    7f46834 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history