-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Big MPI--RMA functionality #99
Labels
Milestone
Comments
tonyskjellum
added
not ready
wg-rma
RMA Working Group
wg-large-counts
Large Counts Working Group
labels
Jun 14, 2018
This was referenced Jun 14, 2018
Here is the initial version of the text: |
Latest text: |
@tonyskjellum / @puribangalore - Is this issue replaced by #137? Can we close this? |
Yes.
…On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:34 AM Wesley Bland ***@***.***> wrote:
@tonyskjellum <https://github.com/tonyskjellum> / @puribangalore
<https://github.com/puribangalore> - Is this issue replaced by #137
<#137>? Can we close this?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#99 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD2CIBNYNI7LFEYBV3KQQXTSJSC7JANCNFSM4FFAJRHQ>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Problem
For 64-bit clean functionality, convenience, and symmetry, the Big MPI principles being applied in Ticket #80 to collective operations should be applied to MPI RMA functionality.
Proposal
64-bit clean versions of RMA operations will be provided.
Changes to the Text
New APIs and descriptions with suffix _X will be added to support 64-bit clean operations for RMA chapter.
Impact on Implementations
Implementations will have to support the new API plus any internal changes to support larger transfers.
Impact on Users
Users who opt in to the new API will be able to do larger RMA transfers.
References
Tickets #80, #97, #98 are closely related.
PR https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/62
RMA WG Issue to cross-correlate: mpiwg-rma/rma-issues#7
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: