Fix #96, Check returns from CFE calls during init

[thnkslprpt]

Checklist

• I reviewed the Contributing Guide.
• I signed and emailed the appropriate Contributor License Agreement to GSFC-SoftwareRelease@mail.nasa.gov and copied cfs-program@lists.nasa.gov.

Describe the contribution

• Fixes Check Return Value of CFE_SB_CreatePipe  #96
  • Returns from CFE_EVS_Register(), CFE_SB_CreatePipe(), and CFE_SB_Subscribe() during CI_LAB initialization sequence that are != CFE_SUCCESS will now generate an EVS event reporting the error.
  • Also added new Event IDs for these error events.

Testing performed
Build + Run cFS locally to confirm CI_LAB still running fine with these changes.

Also ran with inverse for each event (checking if status == CFE_SUCCESS) to confirm structure and format of events is fine - they are shown here:

Expected behavior changes
Program logic not changed, but new events reports will now be generated for failures generated by these CFE calls.

System(s) tested on
Intel(R) Celeron(R) N4100 CPU @ 1.10GHz x86_64
Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Current main branch cFS bundle.

Contributor Info
Avi @thnkslprpt

[github-advanced-security]

You have successfully added a new CppCheck configuration cppcheck. As part of the setup process, we have scanned this repository and found no existing alerts. In the future, you will see all code scanning alerts on the repository Security tab.

[github-advanced-security]

You have successfully added a new CodeQL-coding-standard configuration coding-standard. As part of the setup process, we have scanned this repository and found 12 existing alerts. Please check the repository Security tab to see all alerts.

[github-advanced-security]

You have successfully added a new CodeQL-security configuration security. As part of the setup process, we have scanned this repository and found no existing alerts. In the future, you will see all code scanning alerts on the repository Security tab.

[dmknutsen]

@thnkslprpt Can you replace CI_LAB_INIT_INF_EID with CI_LAB_STARTUP_INF_EID?

[thnkslprpt]

@thnkslprpt Can you replace CI_LAB_INIT_INF_EID with CI_LAB_STARTUP_INF_EID?

@dmknutsen I rebased to main and all passing now (was able to leave it with the updated CI_LAB_INIT_INF_EID version [90% of the cFS apps/components use INIT rather than STARTUP]) - is that cool?

[dmknutsen]

Yep - that works. Thanks Avi!