Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v4.0.x: Revert "Allow mpi_init_thread to override the MPI_THREAD_LEVEL" #9331

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2021

Conversation

jsquyres
Copy link
Member

@jsquyres jsquyres commented Aug 30, 2021

This reverts commit 8819790.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Squyres jsquyres@cisco.com

bot:notacherrypick

This is a behavior change on the v4.0.x branch, and potentially has backwards compatibility issues. See #9312 (review) for an explanation.

This reverts commit 8819790.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@cisco.com>
@jsquyres jsquyres added this to the v4.0.7 milestone Aug 30, 2021
@jsquyres jsquyres mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2021
@awlauria awlauria requested review from bosilca and removed request for awlauria August 30, 2021 15:54
@jsquyres jsquyres mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2021
@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

We'll discuss tomorrow and either revert this or we'll make another PR perhaps using an mca param.

@jsquyres
Copy link
Member Author

Per #9332 (comment), the current code should be reverted via this PR, and a new PR with the functionality described in #9332 can be submitted.

Copy link
Member

@gpaulsen gpaulsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reverting until we can get a better solution from #9332

@gpaulsen gpaulsen merged commit 3a31426 into open-mpi:v4.0.x Sep 16, 2021
@jsquyres jsquyres deleted the pr/revert-mpi-init-thread-change branch January 6, 2022 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants