Add More HRMP Channel Opening Tests #2915
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
joepetrowski
added
R0-silent
bkchr
approved these changes
Jan 11, 2024
bkontur
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A recent referendum failed because the parachain's sovereign account had enough funds for the deposit (the runtime at the time required a deposit) but not enough left over for the existential deposit, which must remain free.
The current logic does not require a deposit for channels with system chains, and the current tests check that none is taken. This new test simply ensures that even without any balance in a parachain's sovereign account, opening a channel with a system chain will be successful.