-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: do not convert filter to range for table scan with tiflash #12682
planner: do not convert filter to range for table scan with tiflash #12682
Conversation
/run-unit-test |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #12682 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 79.9084% 79.8443% -0.0641%
================================================
Files 461 461
Lines 104168 103678 -490
================================================
- Hits 83239 82781 -458
+ Misses 14819 14811 -8
+ Partials 6110 6086 -24 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
but any bench result?
@winoros The coprocessor in TiFlash can't support range scan. So they now always use the full range, the bench test will be added after the integrated test with them. |
Ok |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Your auto merge job has been accepted, waiting for 12676, 12640 |
/run-all-tests |
What problem does this PR solve?
As the title says.
What is changed and how it works?
Change the range and the filter conditions in
DataSource.getOriginalPhysicalTableScan
.Check List
Tests
Side effects