Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert change that causes px deploy to timeout on initial deployment #1899

Merged

Conversation

ddelnano
Copy link
Member

Summary: Revert change that causes px deploy to timeout on initial deployment

This reverts #1670, which creates a circular dependency between the operator and the cloud connector service. The cloud connector service is responsible for registering a vizier and populating the pl-cluster-secrets k8s secret with its vizier ID. The operator is responsible for creating the vizier services (including the cloud connector), so this call will never succeed on a fresh install.

This bug doesn't cause pixie installs to fail completely. A px deploy cli command will time out after 10 minutes and then the vizier is deployed following that timeout expiration. While it eventually converges to a healthy vizier, this is a poor user experience. The perf tool is also experiencing this problem, but because it requires px deploy to return a successful status code it is causing it to fail completely.

Relevant Issues: Reopens #1632

Type of change: /kind bug

Test Plan: Reverted this change and verified that the a skaffold'ed operator doesn't timeout

@ddelnano ddelnano requested a review from a team as a code owner May 13, 2024 16:41
…Service (pixie-io#1670)"

This reverts commit c9813f7.

Signed-off-by: Dom Del Nano <ddelnano@gmail.com>
@ddelnano ddelnano force-pushed the ddelnano/revert-operator-breaks-px-deploy branch from 46b4b12 to ae6174a Compare May 13, 2024 16:46
@ddelnano ddelnano merged commit 66b0515 into pixie-io:main May 13, 2024
23 checks passed
@ddelnano ddelnano deleted the ddelnano/revert-operator-breaks-px-deploy branch May 13, 2024 17:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants