Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(PDK-1099) Merge Puppet::Util::Windows into PDK namespace #565

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2018

Conversation

rodjek
Copy link
Contributor

@rodjek rodjek commented Aug 21, 2018

Pulls the minimum amount of Puppet::Util::Windows into the PDK namespace to meet our needs. I've maintained the existing file structure so that if we need to add another FFI method in the future it can be done easily.

The main benefit of this change is that it will allow the PDK and Puppet gems to be colocatable without any potential conflicts due to the vendored code.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 21, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.007%) to 92.875% when pulling 5dfdb27 on rodjek:pdk-1099 into 20a0b05 on puppetlabs:master.

@rodjek rodjek force-pushed the pdk-1099 branch 2 times, most recently from 546e101 to 3b04614 Compare August 21, 2018 06:31
@rodjek rodjek changed the title [WIP] (PDK-1099) Merge Puppet::Util::Windows into PDK namespace (PDK-1099) Merge Puppet::Util::Windows into PDK namespace Aug 21, 2018
@rodjek rodjek requested review from bmjen and scotje August 21, 2018 08:40
Copy link
Contributor

@scotje scotje left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

Copy link
Contributor

@bmjen bmjen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@bmjen bmjen merged commit 02b6bf0 into puppetlabs:master Aug 22, 2018
@rodjek rodjek deleted the pdk-1099 branch August 23, 2018 00:20
@bmjen bmjen added the feature label Oct 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants