Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move legacy implementations into legacy directories #1752

Conversation

ChuckHastings
Copy link
Collaborator

@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings commented Aug 3, 2021

This is phase 1 of the plan to move the now non-experimental things in the experimental namespace into the cugraph namespace. Unfortunately, some of the legacy implementations are still required, so we're going to move the files into legacy directories so they can be removed later.

NOTE: This is not moving everything that is legacy into legacy directories. Only things that are in the way of new things or were in the same directories as things that were in the way of new things. We will move other things into legacy directories when/if needed.

@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings requested review from a team as code owners August 3, 2021 16:45
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings self-assigned this Aug 3, 2021
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings added 3 - Ready for Review improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Aug 3, 2021
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings added this to the 21.10 milestone Aug 3, 2021
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 3, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.10@74047a5). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.10    #1752   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   59.75%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?       77           
  Lines                   ?     3523           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?     2105           
  Misses                  ?     1418           
  Partials                ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 74047a5...91cdcf1. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@seunghwak seunghwak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me (can't we delete some of the unused legacy implementations? e.g. are we using katz_centrality?)

@ChuckHastings
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Looks good to me (can't we delete some of the unused legacy implementations? e.g. are we using katz_centrality?)

I think in one of my previous tries at this I tried deleting some of these things. I believe katz_centrality was one of the things that I could delete. I'll test that out on my next PR and delete what I can.

@ChuckHastings
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit f1dffc4 into rapidsai:branch-21.10 Aug 4, 2021
@ChuckHastings ChuckHastings deleted the remove_experimental_namespace_phase1 branch February 1, 2022 16:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants