Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't re-look-up tables to avoid dots problem #2787

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2016

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

If a links value has a . in the name Cargo would previously panic, but this
alters the code to be more principled about lookup in tables to ensure that we
don't misinterpret the names.

Closes #2786

If a `links` value has a `.` in the name Cargo would previously panic, but this
alters the code to be more principled about lookup in tables to ensure that we
don't misinterpret the names.

Closes rust-lang#2786
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @wycats

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

r? @brson

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned brson and unassigned wycats Jun 17, 2016
@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Jun 17, 2016

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 17, 2016

📌 Commit 53b7422 has been approved by brson

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
Don't re-look-up tables to avoid dots problem

If a `links` value has a `.` in the name Cargo would previously panic, but this
alters the code to be more principled about lookup in tables to ensure that we
don't misinterpret the names.

Closes #2786
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 17, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 53b7422 with merge 1d6b639...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 17, 2016

@bors bors merged commit 53b7422 into rust-lang:master Jun 17, 2016
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the links-with-dots branch July 1, 2016 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants