Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

impl From<bool> for AtomicBool #46293

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2017
Merged

Conversation

ollie27
Copy link
Member

@ollie27 ollie27 commented Nov 27, 2017

This seems like an obvious omission from #45610. I've used the same feature name and version in the hope that this can be backported to beta so it's stabilized with the other impls. If it can't be I'll change it to 1.24.0.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @TimNN

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Nov 27, 2017
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Marked as beta nominated.

cc @rust-lang/libs -- what do you think about backporting this to beta?

@sfackler
Copy link
Member

I don't really see any reason to backport this.

@kennytm kennytm added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 27, 2017
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Agreed that feature-wise this seems fine but I probably wouldn't do the backport

@TimNN TimNN assigned BurntSushi and unassigned TimNN Nov 27, 2017
@ollie27
Copy link
Member Author

ollie27 commented Nov 27, 2017

Right, I've changed it to 1.24.0.

@kennytm kennytm removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Nov 27, 2017
@BurntSushi
Copy link
Member

LGTM. @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2017

📌 Commit 71d766b has been approved by BurntSushi

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 28, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 71d766b with merge 736976d701b620831b0617661bdc0ef0e953b21a...

@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Nov 29, 2017

@bors treeclosed=1

Something's wrong with the macOS CI, investigating.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Nov 29, 2017

@bors retry — travis-ci/travis-ci#8821

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2017
impl From<bool> for AtomicBool

This seems like an obvious omission from rust-lang#45610. ~~I've used the same feature name and version in the hope that this can be backported to beta so it's stabilized with the other impls. If it can't be I'll change it to `1.24.0`.~~
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2017
Rollup of 10 pull requests

- Successful merges: #45969, #46077, #46219, #46287, #46293, #46322, #46323, #46330, #46354, #46356
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 71d766b into rust-lang:master Nov 29, 2017
@ollie27 ollie27 deleted the atomic_bool_from branch November 29, 2017 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants