Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not ICE on unnamed future #67289

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2019
Merged

Conversation

estebank
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #67252.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 13, 2019
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor Author

Depending on how quickly we land this it might need a beta backport after the next beta release.

@estebank estebank added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Dec 13, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Dec 14, 2019

r? @Centril

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned Centril and unassigned eddyb Dec 14, 2019
@Centril Centril added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Dec 14, 2019
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@estebank so the beta-nomination here is for "current master", i.e., we want this in 1.41, not the release next week, right? I am skipping it for beta backports at least so it probably won't get in.

@estebank
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=Centril

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 15, 2019

📌 Commit e08944f has been approved by Centril

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 15, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2019
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2019
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #67255 (Remove i686-unknown-dragonfly target)
 - #67267 (Fix signature of `__wasilibc_find_relpath`)
 - #67282 (Fix example code of OpenOptions::open)
 - #67289 (Do not ICE on unnamed future)
 - #67300 (Restore original implementation of Vec::retain)
 - #67305 (Doc typo)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit e08944f into rust-lang:master Dec 15, 2019
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

discussed in T-compiler meeting. beta-accepted.

@pnkfelix pnkfelix added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Dec 19, 2019
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

This seems to be on the beta branch already

@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Jan 13, 2020
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
[Beta] Backports

I did not include #67134 and #67289 since they seem to be on beta already.

* Fix up Command Debug output when arg0 is specified. #67219
* Do not ICE on unnamed future #67289
* Don't suppress move errors for union fields #67314
* Reenable static linking of libstdc++ on windows-gnu #67410
* Use the correct type for static qualifs #67621
* Treat extern statics just like statics in the "const pointer to static" representation #67630
* Do not ICE on lifetime error involving closures #67687
@estebank estebank deleted the unnamed-closure branch November 9, 2023 05:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ICE: no name for expr ||
8 participants