Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase test coverage #20

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2022

Conversation

ereslibre
Copy link
Contributor

@ereslibre ereslibre commented Dec 26, 2022

I think this PR checks the "100% line diff coverage" checkbox on #5. I say "I think" because test coverage reporting varies a bit depending on the tool used.

I am running cargo llvm-cov --all-features --html to get the report. I think I didn't miss anything, but the report is not 100% accurate.

Please, let me know if I forgot anything.

@ereslibre ereslibre mentioned this pull request Dec 26, 2022
3 tasks
@djc
Copy link
Member

djc commented Dec 26, 2022

Great work!

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #20 (65cdbd2) into feat-ip-address (fb85e76) will increase coverage by 3.20%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           feat-ip-address      #20      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            82.91%   86.11%   +3.20%     
===================================================
  Files                   15       15              
  Lines                 2095     2326     +231     
===================================================
+ Hits                  1737     2003     +266     
+ Misses                 358      323      -35     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/name/ip_address.rs 100.00% <100.00%> (+7.14%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@ctz ctz merged commit 197e19c into rustls:feat-ip-address Dec 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants