Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update concepts.md #626

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2021
Merged

Update concepts.md #626

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2021

Conversation

MichaelBroughton
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@jaeyoo jaeyoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason why we need to change the word? Isn't it google's quantum supremacy nature paper blog posting, as the URL suggested?

@MichaelBroughton
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There was a big debate about “supremacy” being a bad (offensive) word to use and that “beyond-classical” would be a better alternative. It does make things a little confusing when talking about the paper from 2019, but most people agree “beyond-classical” is better. I actually got a few emails from people internally pointing this out here for us to fix too.

@jaeyoo jaeyoo self-requested a review September 6, 2021 19:45
Copy link
Member

@jaeyoo jaeyoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason why we need to change the word? Isn't it google's quantum supremacy nature paper blog posting, as the URL suggested?

LGTM

@jaeyoo jaeyoo merged commit f2a9892 into master Sep 6, 2021
@jaeyoo jaeyoo deleted the supremacy_rename branch September 6, 2021 19:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants