Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add LRCL TMA #326

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2023
Merged

add LRCL TMA #326

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2023

Conversation

tgpetrica
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Add TMA NAPOC

Motivation and Context

How to prove the effect of this PR?

Data is taken from GNG sectors data.
image

The map above is ENR 6-2 from local AIP Romania, link to AIP.
The TMA NAPOC consists of two sectors: TMA NAPOC North and TMA NAPOC South, always one controller even IRL.
More than this, in the North of TMA there is a delegated airspace from ACC to APP (FL55-FL175) the same upper limit of TMA (FL175) due airways used by LRSM/LRBM ARR/DEP traffic. This information is not published on AIP, but the APP (LRCL_APP) does control the entire area.

Additional info

If needed, you can contact @georgeenciu, George being our vACC Director to confirm all the information here.

An explication to how sectors are defined below:
image

Data here in json file:
image

Data from GNG:
image

Is this a breaking change?

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist

  • My change or addition follow the formatting standard of the project.
  • I am on the list of approved contributors.

Copy link
Collaborator

@dirtyformal dirtyformal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@kmoberg kmoberg merged commit 74db340 into vatsimnetwork:main Sep 7, 2023
@tgpetrica tgpetrica deleted the add_LRCL_TMA branch December 12, 2023 22:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants