Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[14_0] Add AXO and CICADA seeds to uGT Timing config and modifies online DQM client era to Run3_2024 #45856

Closed

Conversation

jaisatul
Copy link
Contributor

@jaisatul jaisatul commented Sep 2, 2024

PR description:

This PR adds unprescaled AXO and CICADA seeds (L1_AXO_Nominal, L1_AXO_VTight, L1_CICADA_Medium, L1_CICADA_VTight) to unprescaled uGT algo shortlist. This aims to add these seeds to uGT algo accept vs BX plots (L1T Online shift plots 19-20). This PR also modifies the era in the DQM client config files

PR validation:

All code compiles and formatting have been applied. Tested locally with 14_0_15.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

This PR is a backport of #45242 and #45634.

…odifies era from Run3 to Run3_2024 in Online DQM client configs
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2024

A new Pull Request was created by @jaisatul for CMSSW_14_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQM/Integration (dqm)
  • DQM/L1TMonitor (dqm)

@antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@batinkov, @francescobrivio, @missirol, @mmusich, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 2, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Sep 2, 2024

I think this is a duplicate of #45805

@jaisatul
Copy link
Contributor Author

jaisatul commented Sep 2, 2024

@mmusich,
Yes, sorry I got a bit delayed in testing the backport. It seems like you already took care of it.
Thanks!
Do we also have backport for 14_1?
I will close this PR.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Sep 2, 2024

Do we also have backport for 14_1?

yes, and also that one is already done: #45819

I will close this PR.

yes, please - thank you.

@jaisatul jaisatul closed this Sep 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants