Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update github workflows to ubuntu 22.04 #4986

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

denyeart
Copy link
Contributor

Update github workflows to ubuntu 22.04.

Update github workflows to ubuntu 22.04.

Signed-off-by: David Enyeart <enyeart@us.ibm.com>
@denyeart
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ryjones Would we be able to get runners for fabric-ubuntu-22.04?

@ryjones
Copy link
Member

ryjones commented Sep 17, 2024

@ryjones Would we be able to get runners for fabric-ubuntu-22.04?

Yes

@ryjones
Copy link
Member

ryjones commented Sep 17, 2024

@ryjones Would we be able to get runners for fabric-ubuntu-22.04?

Yes

fabric-ubuntu-latest is already 22.04. do you want fabric-ubuntu-latest to be 24.04, and a specific runner for 22.04?

@denyeart
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ryjones Would we be able to get runners for fabric-ubuntu-22.04?

Yes

fabric-ubuntu-latest is already 22.04. do you want fabric-ubuntu-latest to be 24.04, and a specific runner for 22.04?

@ryjones If fabric-ubuntu-latest will remain at 22.04 until we explicitly move up, we can use fabric-ubuntu-latest. What I'm trying to avoid is having fabric-ubuntu-latest move up without our knowledge and consent. For that reason I thought it would be safer to use fabric-ubuntu-22.04. But if fabric-ubuntu-latest will stay at 22.04 then we can use it.

@denyeart
Copy link
Contributor Author

Talked to Ry, we're just going to use fabric-ubuntu-22.04 for the time being.

@denyeart denyeart merged commit 2d95a83 into hyperledger:main Sep 17, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants