Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/v4 shaker+examples #202

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 9, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Implausiblyfun
Copy link
Contributor

Considered a different space for shaker but current thoughts as follows.

While it is fairly decoupled shaker relies on window and scene so it doesnt make sense in either location but it also doesnt make sense in entities.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 9, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #202 (2844e45) into feature/v4-drivers (a4bafb1) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##           feature/v4-drivers     #202      +/-   ##
======================================================
+ Coverage               92.38%   92.40%   +0.01%     
======================================================
  Files                     137      137              
  Lines                    6149     6149              
======================================================
+ Hits                     5681     5682       +1     
+ Misses                    411      408       -3     
- Partials                   57       59       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
collision/rtree.go 97.90% <0.00%> (-1.40%) ⬇️
drawLoop.go 39.75% <0.00%> (+2.40%) ⬆️
sceneLoop.go 96.55% <0.00%> (+3.44%) ⬆️

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

@200sc
Copy link
Contributor

200sc commented Apr 9, 2022

This should precede #198

@200sc 200sc merged commit df732e5 into feature/v4-drivers Apr 9, 2022
@200sc 200sc deleted the feature/v4-shaker+examples branch April 9, 2022 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants